The right-wing party’s spokesperson, Martin Henriksen, told Arab News that Muslim worship is "fine” if the praying ritual takes place in "normal buildings without minarets”, such as "offices or warehouses.”
"We take a stand against the divisive symbolism of traditional mosques,” Henriksen said. "We stand against those who try to divide themselves from society,” the MP added.
Henriksen said he was "not against Muslims or Islam” and that individuals should be free to practice their faith as long as they abide by the rules of the "Danish constitution.”
The populist, anti immigration DPP on Thursday called for a ban on the construction of new mosques, as part of a plan to tackle "ghettos” in the country. Other measures unveiled in the package include an 8 p.m. curfew for young people.
Henriksen confirmed that the DPP, which is the second largest party in the Danish parliament, aims to ban the construction of mosques in cities where there are "social problems.”
Chris Doyle, director of CAABU, Council for Arab British Understanding, said: "This is a lop-sided view. What about churches or Hindu temples? All these can also been as symbols of different religions living peacefully and cohabiting and assimilating well. It’s wrong to point out mosques and make Muslims feel like they are third class citizens. A minaret is something that shouldn’t be seen as wrong or divisive in any way shape or form.”
He continued: "As if not building mosques would in any way resolve the problem. This problem is not about mosques … and this rhetoric is pandering to a populist ethos which is anti-Muslim. (The DPP’s proposal is) completely counterproductive and wrong at every level.”
Doyle added: "It will only exacerbate hate crime and bigotry which is growing in Europe. There are concerns about mass immigration into the EU and legitimate worries about extremist attacks in Europe, but none of that warrants the stopping of building mosques.”